Scattered Work

The Importance of Being at the Inauguration

Steve Benen:

Nevertheless, even if it is symbolism, the Warren choice strikes me as Obama’s biggest mistake since the election. He’s elevating a conservative religious leader to new heights, giving him stature and credibility, and making his far-right message that much more meaningful when he challenges Obama administration policies in the future.

I’ve heard a lot of liberals make this argument against having Rick Warren deliver the invocation at Obama’s inauguration, but I just don’t buy it. Delivering this invocation is going to give him more credibility than authoring one of the most popular non-fiction books currently in print? Than hosting a high-profile election debate at his church? Than being on all those “most influential leaders” lists published by Time, Newsweek, et al? And of course, you could always make this argument from the other side: by having Warren involved in the innauguration, Obama will carry more influence with evangelicals because it shows he respects their leaders, even though he may disagree with them.

One other factor that is not getting nearly as much attention as it should is that there will be another religious leader at the inauguration (performing the benediction): Rev Dr Joseph Lowery. You can read more about him here, but suffice it to say that he’s no homophobe.

Tags: Barack Obama, evangelicals, religion, Rick Warren

1 Comment to The Importance of Being at the Inauguration

1. Okay, this is post inauguration; but, Rick Warren delivered a lame prayer of benediction as prayers go.
   Obama could have better been served by Rob Bell a more socially relevant pastor on a mega church level in Michigan. Bell is young, not judgemental like most in the religious right category, but then he(Bell) would have been considered too much of a leftist even if he is considered the next Billy Graham. Oh well.
jocazjoe on February 7th, 2009

Leave a comment